home



bulletin
board

email

free books

music.mp3

* new stuff

welcome







bulletin board
Rants, raves, reactions, responses

If you think Jim's writing is 'unique,' check out his reader's responses to:
abortion
The Bible
capital punishment
civil unions
cults
eternal security


faith healing
habits
homosexuality
humor
jesus
love
polygamy


The Prayer of Jabez
sexuality
StarWars
threat to society
turkeys



JIM's MUG

FAQ's

What are FAQ's?!

    Web-speak for Frequently Asked Questions
I stumbled across you Web page and was thoroughly impressed by it. I am only 15 years old, but your comments on
love, homosexuality, and romance were relevant and awesome. I'm writing to see if I could have permission to use some of your work in my youth group's monthly newsletter. livin4christ15@juno.com February 26, 1999.

I would like to print out some copies of your article 24-k Crosses to a study group. I'm trying to get these folks interested in computers and the Internet, and I'm hoping that your article, as an example of what they're missing, will encourage them to get "up to speed." dlhart@worldnet.att.net January 22, 1998

    Great! Here's my standard reply for reprint requests: You're welcomed to make up to fifty (50) copies of anything on my site (with the exception of the Brother Bob Blessing sketch) providing you include the © copyright [year] James N. Watkins on the copies. Enjoy!

We would like to ask written permission to perform sketches from Characters in our youth drama team at our church. We are situated in Germiston, Gauteng, South Africa. jdelport@yabo.co.za November 18, 1999.

    As long as you have the actual book from Lillenas, you have permission to perform any of the sketches. If you want to photocopy it for each member, I believe the publisher asks one dollar (US funds) for each copy. You can email Lillenas at drama@lillenas.com.

    I wish I could be there to see you perform them!

Thanks for the wonderful article on the cyber church. I loved it! If there is a mailing list of sorts, then please include me on it. I'd welcome it on a regular basis in my mailbox.

    You can receive Jim's best (?) column of the month plus other goodies by joining his SPAM of the Month Club. Just send an e-mail with "SPAM Me!" in the subject box. (We maintain our own mailing list, so your address is never available to some sleazy marketer! Just Jim's sleazy marketing.)

Hey dude, where are the animated .gifs, streaming video, and wave files? Your site is like so last century! psychohacker@hotmail.com February 16, 2000

    Hey Psychohacker--if that is your real name! I do have some MP3 files. But I'm a bit of a Luddite. I taught graphic design at a university, so, I'm of the old KISS school of design: Keep It Simple, Stupid. Besides, I really hate to wait for all those glitzy graphics sites to download onto my old 386 (see, I am a bit of a Luddite). Most of all, I want my site to reflect my attempt to live a simple, uncluttered life.

Abortion

Thank you for your reply, I visted your site today. I was pleased at what seemed to be your stance against abortion. I used to be in the 'pro-choice' camp. But life is life, we either respect it all or admit we are morally bankrupt. Anyway your pro bank robbery humor made me recall something I read many moons ago, a Harry Harrison book, one of his Stainless Steel Rat entries...postulating that bank robbery was good for the economy. The theory was that all the money stolen was insured. The insurers were rich and could easily pay the loss, so no one was hurt. And the stolen money was spent on goods and services that stimulate economic growth. Nothing like good sarcasm. Craig aka anonymous :0) (July 14, 2000)

The Bible

I just read your idea of what the bible really says. You certainly have no idea, but you will do anything for money in this life, but you can't take it with you. Not that it matters where you are most likely to go unless you do "works" worthy of repentance. You have no idea what God's system is all about and the judgments people will suffer who do as you and Balaam do, add to the word of the Lord God. Or the blessings of obeying God's covenant instead of adding or subtracting from God's w ord. Look on your back. Perhaps you are Balaam's ass, or donkey as you call it, and maybe this warning will cause you to turn aside to avoid death by the Lord's Angel! alpha@kuntrynet.com June 20, 2000

    I do appreciate your concern for me. Thanks! I am, however, concerned that your letter doesn't seem to reflect Christ's command that "By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another" (John 13:35, KJV) and Paul's admonition to "Let your speech be alway with grace . . ." (Colossians 4:6, KJV). May we both work to be more "conformed to the image of His Son" (Romans 8:29, KJV).

Jim, I truly enjoy reading your site. I agree with you most of the time (can't make everybody happy all the time). I especially enjoy your position on the Bible. I do have one question, however. Which Bible do you read. I am a staunce supporter of the Authorized Version of the 1611 King James. I believe with every fiber of my mortal being that the KJV is the ONLY word of God for the English speaking people. chumxird@excelonline.com February 26, 1999.

    Steve, I wish I could say the original Greek is my favorite verson, but I nearly flunked the four semesters of Greek I took. The New American Standard Version--in my fallible opinion--is as close to the original Greek that I've found.

Capital punishment

I enjoyed reading your article about the death penalty. I am sure you get lots of email pro and con, but I'd like to add one more point that could bolster your argument even more. Several Christian death-penalty proponents like to cite the Old Testament, and you countered this very well in your article by saying, "but the New Testment says . . .". Still, this does not faze them, for various reasons. Here's what I use to make my point with those folks Several verses in the Old Testament state very clearly that the only cases where murders can be put to death are those in which the accused was seen committing the crime. There must be at least 2 people who actually saw him do it. Example Deuteronomy 176 "On the testimony of two or three witnesses a man shall be put to death, but no one shall be put to death on the testimony of only one witness." This would, at the very least, let Timothy McVeigh off the hook. Anyway, I like your site. Thanks. James Williams, www.spirit-food.com May 14, 2001

Your logic is nuts! Your exegesis is nuts! You are nuts! [no name] February 4, 1998

A GREAT article on Capital Punishment. I appreciate the study and research you have given to the topic. Blessings and keep up the good work. 76511.2757@compuserve.com February 4, 1998

Thanks for your insights on capital punishment. It's nice to hear someone else have compassion on others who have sinned. Keep up the good work. It is really refreshing. rgrande@kdsi.net March 7, 1998

I am a student at the University of Pittsburg and I strongly agree with you that capital punishment is wrong and that it is not supported by the Bible! Your web site is very informative and causes people to really think. God bless and congratulations on being so effective. renst7+@pitt.edu October 27, 1998.

'Civil unions'

I read your article describing what you feel about why God is against homosexual relationships - because they distort the image of God. Thank you very much for speaking so lovingly yet truthfully about a controversial subject. I think it is easily misunderstood that Christians speak about the person rather than their behavior, but you have made it clear that the behavior of homosexuality is wrong without labelling the person an unloved and unloveable person.

Thank you Mr. Watkins. I look forward to reading more of what God has laid on your heart.

Your sister in Christ, Tmorgan93@aol.com (July 10, 2000)

I wanted to write to say thank you for the articles on homosexuality and same sex unions and gay orientation. There is so much confusion because of lack of communication between the culture and the church that the definition of "homosexual" is so twisted. I wanted to thank you for your response to this issue as a whole. Thank you. Michael adonailover@yahoo.com

Cults

I thank you for your descriptions of cult-like behavior, etc., but of course, I must take you for task for speaking of the [Roman] Catholic Church as a cult. I think you will find if you really think it over, that it is not. We are always free to come and go, as God gives us free will. I am a Catholic and love my church.

    I hope you understood that I'm not calling the Roman Catholic Church a cult, but like many religious organizations, it does have some troubling characteristics such as the Pope's "ex-cathedra" pronouncements being considered "infallible" and the churches teaching that it is the "one true church." Those are serious "red flags"!

    I mentioned that almost every church has some cult-like characteristics, but it is the number and degrees of them that makes a group a cult. My denomination even has a few red flags.

My mother and grandmother are strong Catholics, but I believe that the Catholic Church is a cult. Should I try to explain to them why I think it’s a cult? [Name withheld] March 6, 2001

    It might be helpful to concentrate on what you and your family can agree upon. C.S. Lewis wrote a great book called Mere Christianity that talks about various denominations and faiths (Roman Catholic, Orthodox Christianity, and Protestants) living in a big hotel. Everyone has their own little room, filled with their interpretations of Scripture, but there is a huge lobby where we believe the same things and can enjoy being with each other. Lewis calls this lobby “mere” (or essential) Christianity.

    So, although I may disagree with some of my Catholic brother's and sister's theology (as well as Orthodox Christianity’s holy statues, Baptist belief of eternal security, and much of the Pentecostal prosperity gospel), I can still enjoy fellowship with all who subscribe to the Apostle’s Creed:

    I believe in God, the Father almighty,
    creator of heaven and earth.
    I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord.
    He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit
    and born of the virgin Mary.
    He suffered under Pontius Pilate,
    was crucified, died, and was buried.
    He descended into hell. ,
    On the third day he rose again.
    He ascended into heaven,
    and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
    He will come again to judge the living and the dead.
    I believe in the Holy Spirit,
    the holy catholic Church,
    the communion of saints,
    the forgiveness of sins,
    the resurrection of the body,
    and the life everlasting. Amen.

    The phrase "holy catholic Church," incidently, means the universal church, not capital “C” Roman Catholic Church. So there is a lot that you and your family can agree on. Concentrate on what you have in common, and prayerfully that will give you the privilege to talk to them about things you disagree on in a non-judgmental way.

You state that: "Roman Catholic Church teaches that the pope's 'ex cathedra' pronouncements are 'infallibly true' and 'must be obediently accepted.'"

This is very true. But here is something that I bet you didn't know: there has only been one ex cathedra statement in the last one thousand years. Catholics accept what the Church declares about matters of faith and morals, and only about faith and morals, as 100% true. The Catholic Church cannot tell us things like "you must buy Colgate toothpaste" or "you can't use the telephone ever again." The bishops, priests, etc., can say that, of course, and one should probably think about what they say, but statements like those are not necessarily more or less binding than a statement of yours or mine.

Sincerely, John Meunier March 10, 2001

    Thanks for the perspective, John!

Isn't it amazing how people who persecute religious freedom are invariably promoting a cult view? Talking about you here, Jim.

On your page about cults you outlined your opposition to individuals who claimed unique knowledge of Christ. Later in your site there is your description of your personal opinion on your view of Christ. Isn't it just one cultist attacking others who have different views?

Surely because people believe something different to you, are they aren't bad.  I say they are just different.

dupisha@dingoblue.net.au January 11, 2001

    Thanks for your good questions! I trust that what I've written in the site on Jesus is not my "personal opinion," but based on what The Bible teaches about Him.

    I firmly believe in the authenticity and authority of The Bible. So, that is the standard by which I assess anyone's--including my own, fallible--beliefs. Granted, there are a ton of ways that humans have interpreted Scripture, we still must have a "Bureau of Weights and Measures" to provide a standard for orthodoxy and heresy. (Imagine trying to buy an ounce of gold if the buyer and seller have very different ideas on what an ounce was and what constituted pure metal?)

    Jesus does teach that there is only one "way, truth, and life" (John 14:6). You'll need to take up your view of "different" with Him.

Eternal security

My church teaches "once saved, always saved." no matter what you do. I'm wondering what you have to say about that. I think I'm a little confused as to if I'm really saved or not. [name withheld] September 8, 1999.

Faith healing

Thank you for an excellent article on "faith healing." I agree with you completely on all points presented. Your common sense approach on this particular topic was great! This is not to say that God does not heal today, but the notion that if you are Christian, then you must never be sick has no Scriptural support. mieraup@telusplanet.net March 2, 1998

Habits

Your approach to looking at habits through the lens of the five W-questions and H-question was very helpful. What I particularly liked about your approach was that it set particular habits and struggles with the context of one's whole life. I feel that when we want to deal with certain issues we often look at them atomistically instead of holistically. In other words, our focus on particular problems can become so narrow and so focused that we tend to lose a wider perspective on what might cause them. prw327@student.canterbury.ac.nz June 11, 1999.

Good and balanced article on the "m" word! At least you did not come out and issue a blanket condemnation of those who do it. I've been to a couple of Christian men's gatherings this year, and I am amused at some men who think it's taboo with NO exceptions. To them I say "What a bunch of bunk!" What a slap in the face to a man in a marriage wherein his mate has little or no interest in sexual relations (say due to menopause or some other unknown reason). What is he to do??? Read pornography? Have an affair?? My gosh, there were Old Testament giants of men who had multiple wives!!! Talk about sexual deviants. It seems that God would not look unfavorably on someone if masturbation is their sexual issue, expspecially if it helps them stay true to their spouse, no matter how frustrating it may be. [Name Withheld] November 6, 2000

Jim's humor column

I looked at your site. I didn't think many of your columns are funny. It's not that they are bad writing, but they aren't humor. The latest one, about The Weakest link - nothing funny there at all. You mentioned There's Something About Mary. That's funny. You aren't a funny author. It'd be better to not promote yourself as funny. I also didn't see any 'meat' to being a threat to society. You don't have any original ideas here, and I'd say that overall you are pretty conformed to the stereotypical cultural 'Christian' norm. You'd have to stand out a lot more to backup the claims you are making about yourself. jared944@hotmail.com May 15, 2001

    "There's Something About Mary"? Hmmm? You and I seem to have a different sense of humor.

Mister Watkins, I enjoy your humor and look forward to more of it. Who says that Christians can't laugh or have fun. In Christ I see JOY abounding. j1mount1@aol.com February 2, 2000.

I believe God made each person with an inside world and an outside world. We show our outside self here and there and that's pretty safe. On the other hand the weird, peculiarities of our inside world rarely get invited out and stay safely inside for only God to see and know. The more I surf your siftings, I'm sure God created you inside out. If you were more transparent, you'd be a pane. harvest@noble.cioe.com March 17, 1999.

I want to thank you personally from the bottom of my heart for your column on "Christians." I agree whole-heartedly with what you have to say. I, too, despise the hateful tactics that some many Christian leaders have taken. It is ineffective, unbiblical, and gives all Christians a bad name. I only wish they would stop, especially Jerry Falwell; he just gets to me, I pray for him every night. beverhar@inscorp.com January 28, 1998.

I especially liked your words regarding attitudes toward homosexuals and abortionists. I have several friends who aren't believers. They associate all "Christians" with gay bashers and killers of abortionists. "Well, you're different," they say to me. That response saddens me even more. Too many church members have given witness of bigotry and have manifested so little grace and compassion. Cec_Haraka@msn.com November 4, 1998.

Thanks for taking a humorous look at Halloween and not reading into it all sorts of extra spiritual meaning that is so often present today in the evangelical's quest to understand, interpret, and respond to their culture. [a denominational leader] November 2, 1998

Jim, I enjoyed the humor-tragedy idea. Nicely written. Wow, sorry to hear about your wife. What a horrible ordeal that must have been for both of you. Strange how little we really know about others' suffering and pain. Cec_Haraka@msn.com. April 1, 1999

Holy Week, the Holocaust . . . and Humor was a brilliant statement of God's purposes. He is in your pen, Jim! ckelly@paul.spu.edu. April 1, 1999.

I loved your suggestion [on dealing with Saddam Hussein]! You know what's funny? A madman named Joe Stalin had chemical weapons and nukes for years and we never bombed him, invaded or even demanded to inspect his sites. Why? Because we couldn't push old Joe around without getting out noses bloodied. They say Saddam is different--that he's a loose cannon. I don't know, but when he did use that stuff agains the Kurds and Iran some years ago, why didn't we stop him then? Oh, I forgot. We were selling all kinds of military equipment to him at the time. Silly me. JSojourner@aol.com February 22, 1998

Jim, I like your thoughts! Seems too much like Wag the Dog lately to me. Even though diplomacy appears to be falling, there must be other ways beside shedding blood to bring [Saddam] to his kness. How about prayer? What a novel idea! vbkidder@aol.com February 20, 1998

It is quite fun to read your perspective on things and absurdity of the things people will buy, write, and/or promote to make a buck. The whole psychic thing and the best-selling Talking to Heaven are enough to make me fall off my chair laughing if they were so sad on the other hand. Asklands@aol.com April 16, 1998.

As always, your column on war was creative and thought-provoking. I wanted to point out that there a glaring difference between the violence in say, Kosovo, and the violence in the school room. One is related to stopping evil (although one would wonder what the real motive of the President is) and the other is perpetuated by evil doers against rhose who are innocent of wrong doing. thinton@familyfireworks.com April 29, 1999.

Great article about war! Remember William Sloane Coffin's comments during the bicentennial. America was a land of freedom built on the back of millions of slaves and the blood of millions of Native Americans. Also, Robert Raines, during the Vietnam War, wrote, "The older men in Congress are asking the younger men to give up what they have: their lives. If the young men would ask the older men in Congress to give up what they have--their money--the war would stop immediately." You raise important issues about the results of violence and the risk of putting our children unnecessarily in harm's way. Thanks again! kspringer@indwes.edu June 1, 1999.

Quitcher whining [about weight], Watkins. Some of us have far more cubic yardage on the slide than you. What we need is emergency stabilization. I mean, we're talking avalanche control, my my friend! It is a comfort, though, to know that even you need suspenders to hold up your knees. Yours for gravity reform, Anonymous in Everett, Washington

    Thanks, Anonymous. It is embarrassing, however, when your doctor suggests you see a specialist--the Army Corps of Engineers.

Jesus

I really appreciated your commentary on the real Jesus. I'm interested in linking it to our church Web page. How long will you have it posted? Do you write a new commentary every week? Month? Or blue moon? markh7557@aol.com March 1, 1999.

    Sure, feel free to link any of my pages to your site. I keep columns online as long as people are taking a look at them. I crank out a new column every single week for a couple newspapers including The News-Sun. I only post the best (?) ones on my site.

Love

I wrote to you because I question the way I interpret love. I felt I've been a loving person all my life until recently. Today, when I looked up love on the Internet and found your Web page, it did something to me. In all honesty, when I first saw it I said, "Oh, this is some Bible thing; people trying to get you to believe in God." I didn't want to look at it, not because I wasn't interested, but because I am bitter. I started reading it with this attitude of sarcasm. The funny thing was, though, for some reason I kept reading it through the end. Even if I had thoughts of clicking out of that screen, my hands were frozen, like God sitting me at a table saying, "Here's your lesson, now learn it!" It was very strange. [Name withheld] November 5, 1998

    It sounds as if God is trying to get your attention and remind you how much He loves you.

How do you go from being a hateful person to opening up to God and expecting Him to make everything okay? [Name withheld]

    The Bible tells us that we can love only because He loved us first. The characteristic that describes God is "love" (1 John 4:7), so when we invite God into our lives, His love is in us. He can love others through us. In our own strength and human nature, it's much easier to hate. But if we are allowing God to make us into the kind of person He wants us to be, He will give us the strength and grace to love others. And, to love ourselves as well.

Polygamy

Jim, I hesitate to write this because you've always been so kind. Usually you're so funny and/or "right on.” But this particular article is baaaaad, in my humble opinion. In fact, am really surprised at this coming from you, an ordinarily a very sensitive guy. I think maybe you didn't realize that it would sound as though you're coming forth as a supporter of Mormonism. Now I know you, and I know that isn't your stance. But . . . what about those who don't know you? Read it again. Can you see how someone could take it like that? May 31, 2001

    My high school journalism teacher used to remind us, "You can't flunk the reader!" If something is unclear, it's the author's fault not the reader's, so apparently I flunked. My point is this: if our culture is going to be so "tolerant" of all kinds of immoral behavior (straight, gay, or whatever), why is it picking on someone who is simply living out the culture's amoral attitudes? And thanks for pointing out that I’m neither a Mormon or a polygamist.

The Prayer of Jabez

Just a few weeks ago I got a couple of emails referring to Jabez and the book about prayer. I logged onto the Web site and read the glowing tale of the number of the books sold, etc. Also I read the "glowing" testimonies of those who had reported on their experiences. I confess that my response was less than enthusiastic. It seemed to me that the book sets up the readers to believe that by following the formula of the prayer of Jabez one could have a magic button that would guarantee all kind of success. To make the account of Jabez's prayer to be the way to prayer minimizes The Lord's Prayer and other Bible teaching on prayer. Your article puts the matter in very good perspective and I agree whole heartedly!! H. John Blann March 31, 2001

Re: Prayer of Jabez: Our sentiments, too. Thanks so much for putting it so well! Blessings, Patti Souder July 3, 2001

I read your Prayer of Jabez column. Sure, you make some good points. I think you are taking the wrong approach, though. The purpose is just to address this one prayer. Does anyone really expect everything on prayer to be included in a book of 100 plus pages? Of course Mr. Wilkinson left some things out. Of course the book isn't "balanced." Steve Ghazarian" July 18, 2001

Just visited your website. Very funny! I, too, wrote an article on it after feeling very uncomfortable with the hype surrounding it. You touched on one of the points I made as well on my www.intimateprayer.com. Blessings, Wanda Schwandt, July 19, 2001

Thank you, thank you, thank you. There was a time I thought I was the only one who felt this way about the Prayer of Jabez. I have been ridiculed and condemned as having little faith because I say, "Jesus gave us a better way." I have found that there are many in Christ's church today who would much rather follow the Old Covenant rather than the New, better, Covenant our Lord Jesus Christ gave by His blood. Once again, I thank you for standing up for the truth that is in the Gospel of our Lord, that we are to humbly submit to His Word and live as He calls us to live -- blessed according to His perfect will. May God continue to bless your ministry this day and always. Blessings, Peg at awordfortoday.org, July 9, 2001

The truth of the matter is that Jabez is a missionary book in disguise. It's all about taking the world for God, impacting others for him. It's one thing when secular media (who also haven't read the book or choose to ignore those parts that make it clear it's not a "prosperity gospel”) slam the book. But when your own Christian writing peers choose to blithely knock the book, that's very disheartening. If you want to take issue with how some Christians turn what God is doing into a fad or take ideas to extremes, that’s one thing. But to imply that all the T-shirts and trinkets are Bruce’s doing is just wrong. If an author has a hit book like the Prayer of Jabez, which is based on a passage in the Bible, the author has no control over what other people do with the title. As long as they're not reprinting his copyrighted author text, merchandisers can sell anything about the prayer of Jabez they want. Bruce is dismayed over the trinkets, etc. as it cheapens the message, turns it into a fad, and also because so many people don't realize it's not his doing. What's more, since titles can't be copyrighted, anyone who wanted to could publish a book called The Prayer of Jabez, so long as they didn't violate Bruce's "dress rights," (the cover and packaging). For example, NavPress is putting out a 60 day guide to The Prayer of Jabez. I felt that you would have done a much greater service to your readers if you sincerely analyzed what it is about Jabez that made it a hit from a publishing standpoint. Let's see. Could it be any or all of these things?: It's a small, surprising format. It's a book for non-readers (only 10% of Xns are "readers") that can be read in a sitting. It's written in a lively, engaging style. It's a book that presents a positive, loving God who answers prayer. It's a book with a huge promise directly related to a huge felt need. It says to every person, "No matter how small or insignificant you feel, you can have a big life for God." As a result of what God is doing through Jabez, many non-believers and fringe Christians have been introduced to God. Then, many millions of those (yes, millions) went out and bought Bruce's next book in the same series, Secrets of the Vine. This book couldn't be farther from a sweet treat for Christians. It is a serious book that calls readers to be willing to suffer pain and discipline in order to bear the kind of fruit God wants. I can't think of a better defense of Jabez, and Bruce's true intentions. When Bruce (and Dave) set out to write Jabez, they of course had no idea such success would follow. Bruce had no intention that people should stop praying the Lord's Prayer or elevate Jabez above Jesus. The fact of the matter is, the Prayer of Jabez echoes the Lord's prayer in many ways, and it is how Jesus eventually taught us to pray. "Ask," said Jesus. And "how much more does your Father want to give good things?" And "Go into all the world" (expand territory). Jabez is just a tool, a fresh way to get people praying for what God wants. Heather Kopp [The wife of David Kopp, who co-authored The Prayer of Jabez] August 16, 2001

    Thanks for your perspective. And, yes, I did read it.

When I first heard about the prayer of Jabez, I looked it up in my various versions of the Bible and found exactly what Jim Watkins described. I was a little shocked that such a self-serving prayer could be turned into "that I may not cause pain." I applaud Jim for writing what he did and for Stan Baldwin for publishing it in the ICW newsletter. A lot of scripture has been twisted to use as "happy pills." This one makes me wonder about Christian publishing. Elsie Larson August 16, 2001

I have mixed feelings about your Jabez column. I realize we need to have a balanced diet. The prayer of Jabez must have been important for us to know since it is recorded in the OT. He may not be listed in the Hebrews Hall of Faith but he is mentioned by name in the Bible. He is singled out in a long list of genealogies. When I pray it, it is not the only prayer I pray and I don't pray asking for no pain - I pray asking God to help me to not cause anyone else any pain. I may be defensive re: the book since our lives have completely changed due to prayer and that prayer is one of many prayers we have prayed over the past few months. I truly want God's blessing on my life every second. I don't want to live without His blessing. His blessings may not be material. I don't think I am being selfish when I ask for His blessing. I am not necessarily asking for money, houses, land, etc., I am asking for blessings that only come from His hand (which could include material/financial wealth). My prayer is more for His peace, His presence, His power, His protection and His provision in/for my life. But even in the midst of the bad that comes into our life, we have been blessed. We have seen God's hand at work in the darkest of times and count those times as blessings, too. We have witnessed the miraculous through some ugly situations. God has blessed us indeed. [Name withheld] July 3, 2001

    Thanks [Name withheld] for your thoughful response. What finally pushed my button was the banner ad on the Internet that said, "Discover the power of a little known prayer." I just about screamed at my computer (I do that a lot) THERE'S NO POWER IN THE PRAYER, THE POWER IS IN GOD!

    I think the major problem with using Jabez as a model of prayer is that he is not our model. Jesus is. Jabez was asking for material blessings. He was asking (at least in the majority of translations) to avoid pain.

    Homiletics professors talked a lot about being careful of using history to build our theology. For instance, David was a "man after God's own heart" but he certainly did some ungodly things. (We shouldn't have an affair, have our lover's spouse killed, or whack off the manhood of one thousand Philistines just because some man after God's own heart did those things.) And they also warn about "spiritualizing" Bible stories. Jabez prayed for material blessings. Wilkinson prayed for minsitry blessings.

    But what troubles me most is this: just because God has blessed Wilkinson's ministry "indeed," faithful, godly pastors in tiny congregation may not see the amazing miracles that the author recounts. (See The Rest of the Bible Story.)

X-ceptional sex

I am 32, married with three sons, and I have been with my wife for eleven years. Silly as it sounds, I am reassessing my views on sex that I developed in high school and college. You information was extremely helpful. WatCal@aol.com May 26, 1999.

StarWars

Jim, I think, rather than Woda, you look more like Spockins. Michael Fraley August 6, 2001

    Thanks for the Spockins rendition, Michael. (I love your Web site and your photo as Detective Mickey LeSeur.) Live long and prosper!

Threat to society

Jim, you have a wonderful God-given talent--and you are a threat to society! Praise God! In a sense,you are a menace to stuffy Christians (dare I say Pharisees?) How refreshing and funny. stutsman@juno.com January 1, 1999.

Turkeys

You have probably been told this a hundred times since you wrote your column on tukeys, but in case you haven't:

a) The world's biggest turkey farmer is Bernard Matthews, not Bernard Matthew; and

b) He doesn't provide us Brits with Thanksgiving turkeys, for the simple reason we don't celebrate Thanksgiving, an exclusively American festival. We eat turkey on December 25, hence the saying that some particularly crass exercise of the democratic franchise is "like turkeys voting for Christmas."

The rest of the column is pretty good, though.

Regards, Timothy James August 15, 2000

    Thanks for keeping this columnist credible! I'll make the changes so that I'm not the turkey.



fine print
Who is this jameswatkins.com?!

Jim is an author, believer, conference speaker, humor columnist, presidential candidate, songwriter, threat to society, and writing instructor.

If you enjoyed this site, save it as bookmark or favorites. Then tell all your family, friends, and email pals know about it! Better yet, link it to your site.

© 2000 James Watkins. All text and graphics on Jim's sites, unless otherwise noted, are copyrighted © in his name, James N. Watkins, and are protected by United States copyright law and international copyright law under the Berne Convention. Jim is usually very generous about granting permission, but do email him for written permission before reproducing any graphics or text. Thanks!

Alliance Member of the Gospel Communications Network
Report problems to webmaster@jameswatkins.com.